Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] fulltext parser strange behave

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>,Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fulltext parser strange behave
Date: 2007-11-19 17:50:53
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Am Montag, 19. November 2007 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Maybe, but "HTML-type" is an unhelpful description.  Isn't there a more
> general markup standard that subsumes both HTML and XML?  (I seem to
> recall that SGML might be that, but not sure.)

I think "XML tag" would actually cover anything that would be valid as an HTML 
tag.  (As opposed to the fact that an XML document is not a superset of an 
HTML document.)

SGML might be too broad.  It would require us to recognize "</>" and "<>" and 
perhaps a few other odd things.

Peter Eisentraut

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-11-19 18:00:31
Subject: Re: VACUUM/ANALYZE counting of in-doubt tuples
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-11-19 17:31:49
Subject: Re: High Availability, Load Balancing, and Replication Feature Matrix

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-11-19 18:37:48
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fulltext parser strange behave
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-11-19 17:00:52
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] fulltext parser strange behave

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group