Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: hardware and For PostgreSQL

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Joe Uhl <joeuhl(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ketema Harris <ketema(at)ketema(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hardware and For PostgreSQL
Date: 2007-10-31 22:30:40
Message-ID: 20071031153040.1adaac07@scratch (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:54:51 -0400
Joe Uhl <joeuhl(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I realize there are people who discourage looking at Dell, but i've
> been very happy with a larger ball of equipment we ordered recently
> from them.  Our database servers consist of a PowerEdge 2950
> connected to a PowerVault MD1000 with a 1 meter SAS cable.
> The 2950 tops out at dual quad core cpus, 32 gb ram, and 6 x 3.5"
> drives.  It has a Perc 5/i as the controller of the in-box disks but
> then also has room for 2 Perc 5/e controllers that can allow
> connecting up to 2 chains of disk arrays to the thing.

The new Dell's based on Woodcrest (which is what you are talking about)
are a much better product that what Dell used to ship.

Joshua D. Drake

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
PostgreSQL Replication:

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Paul LambertDate: 2007-10-31 23:00:51
Subject: Re: hardware and For PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-10-31 22:05:16
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Outer joins and Seq scans]

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group