Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <Josh(dot)Berkus(at)sun(dot)com>,Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)
Date: 2007-10-29 01:22:46
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 08:18:04PM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 10/27/07, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> > The only way I've done multisets is by creating functions that
> > return multiple refcursors, either in a row or as SETOF.  Is or
> > was there some other way?
> <ahem>...arrays of composite type :-)

That's not a multiset either in the T-SQL sense or in the sense in
which the SQL standard defines MULTISET with COLLECT and FUSION.

David (who thinks those might be cool, too)
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres:

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-10-29 01:32:52
Subject: Re: PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2007-10-29 01:18:04
Subject: Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group