On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 12:05:26AM +0300, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval, L, 2007-10-27 kell 12:55, kirjutas Josh Berkus:
> > Merlin, Pavel,
> > > Mutable session variables would be nice, but I'll take a plpgsql
> > > langauge (or psm) with or without them, so long as transactions
> > > are manual. It's possible to emulate variables using scalar
> > > functions with the desired volatility currently (but you still
> > > have to be careful with transactions).
> > The other big useful feature we're missing from Functions is
> > multisets.
> I think that support for multisets has been removed from our fe-be
> protocol implementation bit-by-bit.
How do you mean?
The only way I've done multisets is by creating functions that return
multiple refcursors, either in a row or as SETOF. Is or was there
some other way?
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Florian Weimer||Date: 2007-10-27 21:20:39|
|Subject: Re: Opportunity for a Radical Changes in Database Software|
|Previous:||From: Hannu Krosing||Date: 2007-10-27 21:05:26|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: real procedures again (8.4)|