| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Error correction for n_dead_tuples |
| Date: | 2007-09-26 08:23:20 |
| Message-ID: | 200709260823.l8Q8NKa05660@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
This patch is no longer needed. We can revisit this during 8.4 to see
if it is still needed now that we have HOT.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
> Here is a patch discussed in
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-02/msg00010.php
>
> Concurrent vacuum will save n_dead_tuples value at the beginning.
> Stats collector will be subtract the value from n_dead_tuples
> instead of setting it to zero. The statistics accuracy of n_dead_tuples
> will be better, especially just after finish of a vacuum.
>
> The behavior in VACUUM FULL is not changed because concurrent updates
> are not allowed during VACUUM FULL.
>
> Comments welcome.
>
> Regards,
> ---
> ITAGAKI Takahiro
> NTT Open Source Software Center
[ Attachment, skipping... ]
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-09-26 08:25:28 | Re: Recalculating OldestXmin in a long-running vacuum |
| Previous Message | Tom Raney | 2007-09-26 04:53:55 | Hash Index Build Patch |