Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Vacuum looping?

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Steven Flatt <steven(dot)flatt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Vacuum looping?
Date: 2007-07-28 16:36:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 05:32:11PM -0400, Steven Flatt wrote:
> weren't convinced was doing anything), then start a manual vacuum with a
> higher vacuum_cost_limit to get things cleaned up quicker.

What are your vacuum_cost_* settings? If you set those too aggressively
you'll be in big trouble.

The second pass on the vacuum means that maintenance_work_memory isn't
large enough.
Jim Nasby                                      decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB      512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: andrewDate: 2007-07-28 19:03:52
Subject: Re: Slow query with backwards index scan
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-07-28 14:37:07
Subject: Re: Vacuum looping?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group