Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm sorry guys but I don't agree this is a TODO item.
> > Also, methinks we should have agreed behaviour before we make something
> > a TODO item.
> There is a whole *lot* of stuff in the TODO list that does not have a
> consensus solution yet. You should not imagine that it's gospel.
> At the same time, it'd be better if this item were worded more like
> "investigate this issue" rather than presupposing a particular
> form of answer.
OK, new wording:
o Research self-referential UPDATEs that see inconsistent row versions
in read-committed mode
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2007-06-01 18:53:54|
|Subject: Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updatinganupdatable view)|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-06-01 18:23:38|
|Subject: Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts|