Re: New cast between inet/cidr and bytea

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New cast between inet/cidr and bytea
Date: 2007-05-30 19:01:57
Message-ID: 200705301901.l4UJ1vA24431@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we at Cybertec have developed cast functions in C between
> inet/cidr <-> bytea for a client and we would like to submit it.
>
> This is how it works:
> - IPv4 inet/cidr value will return 4 bytes if the netmask covers all 32
> bits.
> It returns 5 bytes if the netmask is shorter than 32 bits.
> - Similarly for IPv6, 12[+1] bytes is returned.
> - 4, 5, 12 or 13 bytes long bytea values are converted
> to an inet/cidr value, the 5th or 13th byte is range-checked
> to be a valid netmask value.
>
> What are the requirements for it to be accepted
> as a core cast function or as a contrib module?

You discuss it on the hackers list. Have you read the developer's FAQ?
What is the use case for such a cast?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-05-30 19:02:55 Re: Changing checkpoint_timeout to another name?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-05-30 18:54:14 Re: Changing checkpoint_timeout to another name?