Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Updated bitmap index patch

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)alcove(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Updated bitmap index patch
Date: 2007-05-17 22:40:05
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
I though the stream bitmaps was a cleanup of on-disk bitmaps, but I
think you are right that it was for GII too:

Heikki, can you clarify this and send us an updated version?


Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > Due to unfinished VACUUM:
> > 
> > This has been saved for the 8.4 release:
> > 
> >
> While we're at this, let's consider Heikki's patch for the streaming
> indexscan API stuff.  That patch was supposed to come from the bitmap
> index patch, but it was also supposed to help the Grouped Index Tuples
> (GIT) patch.
> In fact, as far as I understood the discussion, GIT would be helped by
> the streaming indexscan API patch, because it would help de-uglify
> certain parts of that patch.  It is my impression that we would not want
> to commit the ugly GIT patch; so it would mean that either we commit the
> streaming indexscan patch first, and a beautiful GIT patch shortly later,
> or we don't commit any of them.
> So, the question is: do we want the GIT patch in 8.3?  If we do, then we
> need the streaming indexscan API patch.  And thus we would need an
> updated (beautiful) GIT patch.
> Is there a resolution on this?  Alexey Kluykin and I would be interested
> in helping review this set of patches, if it is decided that they are
> wanted for 8.3.
> I want to point out that the GIT patch is one of the things sitting in
> the reviewing queue from very early.
> -- 
> Alvaro Herrera                      
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-05-17 22:44:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Removing pg_auth_members.grantor (was Grantor name gets lost when grantor role dropped)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-05-17 22:34:47
Subject: Patch status page

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-05-17 22:47:50
Subject: Re: Automatic adjustment of bgwriter_lru_maxpages
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-05-17 22:24:59
Subject: Re: UTF8MatchText

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group