| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PQprepare question |
| Date: | 2007-05-11 13:48:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20070511134817.GA9188@feivel.credativ.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:08:01AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > According to the docs parameters are referenced as $1, $2, and so. Is
> > there a reason not to use "?" as placeholder?
>
> It's an operator name.
Ah, didn't notice. But that means that ecpg should not accept "?" as
placeholder either as this is prone to give errors depending on the
usage right? I'm not sure how often this is used with external strings
that are prepared. The internal stuff could easily be changed.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-11 13:52:55 | Re: PQprepare question |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-05-11 13:32:22 | Re: PQprepare question |