From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
Date: | 2007-04-30 11:29:54 |
Message-ID: | 200704301129.l3UBTsl20011@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > I like the idea of having a sync point mid cycle, however, what I'd like
> > to see even more is an improved system in which we put less pressure on
> > the few committers we have, and give them more freedom to commit patches
> > they may not understand fully themselves
>
> That is a recipe for disaster :-(. The real problem I see with the big
> patches that are currently in the queue is that I'm not sure even the
> authors understand the patches (or more accurately, all their potential
> consequences) completely. Telling committers they should apply such
> patches without having understood them either is just going to lead to
> an unfixably broken system.
>
> [ thinks for a bit... ] What we need to expand is not so much the pool
> of committers as the pool of reviewers. If a patch had been signed off
> on by X number of reasonably-qualified people then it'd be fair to
> consider that it could be committed. The tracking system you suggest
> could make that sort of approach manageable.
I am still unclear how the patch would get into such a system, and how
we would add comments, apply, and later remove it, without causing us
even more work.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-04-30 11:31:45 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-04-30 11:28:51 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-04-30 11:31:45 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-04-30 11:28:51 | Re: Feature freeze progress report |