Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Implicit casts to text

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Implicit casts to text
Date: 2007-04-26 23:20:07
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Where are we on this?


Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > FWIW, is the attached patch about what you had in mind?  (It probably only 
> > covers "normal" types at the moment.)
> Hm, I hadn't realized that it would take as little work as that ...
> I have an itchy feeling that you missed something but I'm not sure
> what.
> One thing I had wanted to do is take out the existing functions and
> pg_cast entries that are effectively just providing hard-wired
> equivalents to this, but that's merely housekeeping.
> 			regards, tom lane
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-26 23:31:21
Subject: Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared lock object
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-04-26 23:08:22
Subject: Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group