| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? |
| Date: | 2007-04-23 22:17:47 |
| Message-ID: | 200704231517.48045.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
> Eyeing the patch queue and wondering how much of it is really going to
> get in, I'm not sure that eight point two and a half wouldn't be a more
> appropriate name. It's been a short devel cycle and one almost entirely
> focused on performance, not user-visible features.
Ah, in my enthusiasm I was assuming most of it would clear.
>
> > Seems like it'd be both an annoucement of how far we've come, as well as
> > a warning to users that the 8.2-->9.0 upgrade could be painful.
>
> Why would you think that?
File format changes and the implicit conversion patch.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-04-23 22:17:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? |
| Previous Message | usleepless | 2007-04-23 22:03:59 | Re: Wild idea: 9.0? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-04-23 22:17:49 | Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0? |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-04-23 22:15:24 | Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared loc k o b j ect |