| From: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | robins(at)pobox(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Google Summer of Code |
| Date: | 2007-04-23 00:43:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20070423004355.GA6562@timbira.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
Robins wrote:
> Frankly, I think I was pretty much where Andy is. I mean, aren't we
> storing 'only position / sizing (in other words UI) details' in the schema
> ?
>
Nope.
> Storing the database structure in the schema (and not reading it from the
> database) is going to be quite futile for me personally ... you know
> 'managing two schemas' issue.
>
See this link [1] where I explain in details the advantage of storing
the diagram metadata in a XML Schema. Briefly:
* model 1 is database-independent so you don't need a database
connection to open and modify the diagram;
* using model 2, you can't differ if an object is part of one diagram or
another one; so you can't have two models in the same database!
IMHO an general ER Tool (I know it involves a complexity) is better than
a database-driven one.
[1] http://www.timbira.com/soc2007/
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
http://www.timbira.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | svn | 2007-04-23 09:01:39 | SVN Commit by dpage: r6226 - in trunk/pgadmin3: . pgadmin/schema |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-04-22 18:56:28 | Re: Google Summer of Code |