From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PGSQL-Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrzej Rusin <Andrzej(dot)Rusin(at)interia(dot)pl> |
Subject: | Re: DEALLOCATE ALL |
Date: | 2007-03-30 14:41:37 |
Message-ID: | 20070330144137.GK4215@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Marko Kreen escribió:
> On 3/30/07, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> >In any case it's not likely that there are going to be thousands of
> >prepared statements, so is this really an issue?
>
> I think the issue is here that its very common thing to do,
> so open-coding it everywhere is waste, there should be some
> utility function for that.
>
> void hash_foreach(HTAB, void (*cb_func)(void *));
Extra points if you can implement a map() function for hashes ;-) (I
think it's called "mutator" in our sources for other kind of stuff)
I think it would be
void *hash_map(HTAB, void *(*map_func) (void *))
Not sure what the return value would be though :-( (Maybe this is
extra complication enough that it's not worth the hassle)
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2007-03-30 16:05:17 | index support is NULL |
Previous Message | Marko Kreen | 2007-03-30 14:00:29 | Re: DEALLOCATE ALL |