Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Recalculating OldestXmin in a long-running vacuum

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Recalculating OldestXmin in a long-running vacuum
Date: 2007-03-27 17:34:20
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> >> Maybe we should keep this issue open until we resolve the vacuum WAL 
> >> flush issue? I can then rerun the same tests to see if this patch is a 
> >> win after that.
> > 
> > Sounds like a plan, if you are willing to do that.
> Sure, just rerunning the same tests isn't much work.
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >  Would you like to add a TODO item?
> I don't know how we track things like this. Maybe add to the end of the 
> patch queue, with link to this discussion so that we remember that it 
> needs more testing?

OK, I added this email to the patch queue.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-03-27 17:49:39
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-03-27 17:32:00

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group