Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Parallel Vacuum

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Parallel Vacuum
Date: 2007-03-22 17:10:08
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 04:55:02PM +0100, Dimitri wrote:
>In my case I have several CPU on the server and quite powerful storage box 
>which is not really busy with a single vacuum. So, my idea is quite simple - 
>speed-up vacuum with parallel execution (just an algorithm):

Vacuum is I/O intensive, not CPU intensive. Running more of them will 
probably make things slower rather than faster, unless each thing you're 
vacuuming has its own (separate) disks. The fact that your CPU isn't 
pegged while vacuuming suggests that your disk is already your 
bottleneck--and doing multiple sequential scans on the same disk will 
definitely be slower than doing one.

Mike Stone

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Craig A. JamesDate: 2007-03-22 17:21:29
Subject: Re: Performance of count(*)
Previous:From: Bill MoranDate: 2007-03-22 17:03:35
Subject: Re: Potential memory usage issue

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group