Re: Performance of count(*)

From: Michael Stone <mstone+postgres(at)mathom(dot)us>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance of count(*)
Date: 2007-03-22 14:18:10
Message-ID: 20070322141807.GE11402@mathom.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:30:35PM +0200, ismo(dot)tuononen(at)solenovo(dot)fi wrote:
>approximated count?????
>
>why? who would need it? where you can use it?

Do a google query. Look at the top of the page, where it says
"results N to M of about O". For user interfaces (which is where a lot
of this count(*) stuff comes from) you quite likely don't care about the
exact count, because the user doesn't really care about the exact count.

IIRC, that's basically what you get with the mysql count anyway, since
there are corner cases for results in a transaction. Avoiding those
cases is why the postgres count takes so long; sometimes that's what's
desired and sometimes it is not.

Mike Stone

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2007-03-22 14:33:29 Re: Performance of count(*)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-03-22 13:52:05 Re: Parallel Vacuum