From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Jonathan Scher" <js(at)oxado(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: UPSERT |
Date: | 2007-03-02 19:17:46 |
Message-ID: | 200703021117.47121.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Couple notes:
(1) Upsert is not just a desire of MySQL users. I just spec'd a major
proprietary-database replacement project at a fortune 500 where they want an
Upsert and are unhappy that PostgreSQL doesn't have it. Unfortunately, they
don't want to spring for development funds :-(
(2) Doing upsert by checking for a unique key violaton error leads to horrible
performance in addition to the previously mentioned race conditions.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew - Supernews | 2007-03-02 19:28:44 | Re: GIST and TOAST |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2007-03-02 19:09:22 | Re: [HACKERS] WITH/RECURSIVE plans |