| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option |
| Date: | 2007-03-01 15:24:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20070301152421.GJ15006@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 12:16:10PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> background writer, and I think after a server crash, all pages would
> have to be read and checked. The good news is that both of these are
Would they? If you're doing recovery you'd have to read all pages
dirtied since the last checkpoint... could there be pages other than
those that had been torn?
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-01 15:31:38 | Re: CLUSTER, using SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE lock? |
| Previous Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-03-01 15:12:46 | Re: HOT - preliminary results |