Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Rich Teer <rich(dot)teer(at)rite-group(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2969: Inaccuracies in Solaris FAQ
Date: 2007-02-27 19:10:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-patches
Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Zdenek Kotala wrote:
> >> There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
> >> comments.
> > 
> > The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with 
> > Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?".  I don't think "Can I use 
> > this weird internal private library that seems to provide a similar 
> > interface?" is a "Frequently Asked Question".
> > 
> You have right that it is not frequent question, but my colleagues have 
> bad experience with people who did it with samba server and it is only 
> warning "don't do that" for people who want to try it.
> If you guess that it is not important, do not hesitate to remove it.

OK, removed.

  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: postgresDate: 2007-02-27 22:55:19
Subject: BUG #3085: Performance BUG
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-02-27 19:08:38
Subject: Re: BUG #3059: psql to 'postgres' shortcut

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Chris MarcellinoDate: 2007-02-27 19:17:44
Subject: POSIX Shared memory, revised, again
Previous:From: Pavan DeolaseeDate: 2007-02-27 18:23:47
Subject: Re: HOT WIP Patch - version 3.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group