| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, Chad Wagner <chad(dot)wagner(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Igor Lobanov <ilobanov(at)swsoft(dot)com>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Querying distinct values from a large table |
| Date: | 2007-01-30 17:04:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20070130170443.GJ2303@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Gregory Stark wrote:
> (Incidentally I'm not sure where 2-5x comes from. It's entirely dependant on
> your data distribution. It's not hard to come up with distributions where it's
> 1000x as fast and others where there's no speed difference.)
So the figure is really "1-1000x"? I bet this one is more impressive in
PHB terms.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Luke Lonergan | 2007-01-30 18:20:28 | Re: Querying distinct values from a large table |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2007-01-30 16:44:35 | Re: Querying distinct values from a large table |