| From: | Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: cluster or database? |
| Date: | 2007-01-28 14:25:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20070128142517.GA24908@cns.vt.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:42:52PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 14:32:37 -0500,
> Ray Stell <stellr(at)cns(dot)vt(dot)edu> wrote:
> > Is there a drawback to have different clusters on the same
> > system/diskspace? I have different applications I want to support
> > initially on the same server/disk array. I was thinking it would be
> > better/easier to have seperate clusters per app for ease of migration
> > and security. Is it highly superior just to use different dbs? Why?
> > Where is this discussed? Thanks.
>
> The downside to multiple clusters is that is harder to configure them
> to play nice with each other in the way of resource utilization because
> they don't communicate with each other.
Thank you for responding. Do you have any documentation that would
support my efforts to understand some of the issues?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-28 14:28:47 | Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-01-28 14:22:49 | Re: [ADMIN] server process (PID xxx) was terminated by signal |