Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: ruby-postgres module needs work, maintainer

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ruby-postgres module needs work, maintainer
Date: 2007-01-25 22:13:28
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 15:18 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > ruby-postgres != plruby
> > 
> > Oops, sorry.  I got confused.  I also have not heard from the
> > ruby-postgres guy, but as a community we are less likely to have heard
> > from him because interfaces are more independent.
> > 
> I finally did reach the ruby-postgres guy. He said he would incorporate
> my patches. 
> I'd like a real release (that becomes a gem), because the current ruby-
> postgres release is not sufficient (in a number of ways), and I got at
> least one response from someone who literally skipped PostgreSQL support
> in their app because of it:
> I expect there will be more patches also. Hopefully we can get this up
> to speed.
> I've been informed that the Ruby community's gem releases are heavily
> dependent on rubyforge. Without involvement of the rubyforge ruby-
> postgres project, releases would have to be under a different name
> (which would mean changing client code -- not desirable). This is my
> understanding, anyway.

Good, sounds like things are moving forward.

  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: imadDate: 2007-01-26 20:21:21
Subject: Re: Query regarding PostgreSQL date/time binary format for libpq
Previous:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2007-01-25 22:10:45
Subject: Re: ruby-postgres module needs work, maintainer

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group