Re: [HACKERS] [PATCHES] setseed() doc

FYI, Neil has corrected this in CVS HEAD.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> > On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 15:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> AFAICT it's just junk. It happens to be the input times
> >> MAX_RANDOM_VALUE, but what use is that? I wonder if we shouldn't
> >> change the function to return VOID
>
> > I agree. Given how soon we want to get an 8.2 beta out the door, perhaps
> > this change would be best postponed to 8.3 (unless there's another
> > outstanding 8.2 patch that requires initdb?).
>
> Nothing outstanding at the moment.
>
> Although this is surely a small change, it's also pretty low-priority,
> so I'd counsel leaving it for 8.3 rather than trying to cram it in now.
> We have more important things to be worrying about ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +