Re: guid/uuid datatype

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Gevik Babakhani <pgdev(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype
Date: 2007-01-20 03:33:11
Message-ID: 200701200333.l0K3XBQ25274@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I should have been clearer. I think having in the main server or
> > /contrib makes sense. Having data types external to our source tree
> > doesn't seem to work too well because of changes in our API from time
> > to time.
>
> When has the API for data types ever changed?

The API doesn't change, but the way to do things inside the type
functions does changes sometimes.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-20 04:00:57 Re: guid/uuid datatype
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-01-20 03:24:39 Re: guid/uuid datatype