Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Should this be cleared up (maybe a nice first project for lurking new
> If we don't want long forms for some reason, then a comment in the code
> saying why would make sense.
I don't see a strong reason for not to do it. But if you look closely at
the postgres binaries you'll notice some "inconsistencies" e.g.,
pg_ctl doesn't have long options, pg_config doesn't have short options,
postgres almost don't have long options. I agree that it deserves a
cleanup but I don't know if it's worth to do.
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-01-04 03:42:04|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] xlog directory at initdb time|
|Previous:||From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira||Date: 2007-01-04 01:46:57|
|Subject: Re: xlog directory at initdb time|