Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_ctl options

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_ctl options
Date: 2007-01-04 02:07:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Should this be cleared up (maybe a nice first project for lurking new 
> contributors)?\

> If we don't want long forms for some reason, then a comment in the code 
> saying why would make sense.
I don't see a strong reason for not to do it. But if you look closely at
the postgres binaries you'll notice some "inconsistencies" e.g.,
pg_ctl doesn't have long options, pg_config doesn't have short options,
postgres almost don't have long options. I agree that it deserves a
cleanup but I don't know if it's worth to do.

  Euler Taveira de Oliveira

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-04 03:42:04
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] xlog directory at initdb time
Previous:From: Euler Taveira de OliveiraDate: 2007-01-04 01:46:57
Subject: Re: xlog directory at initdb time

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group