Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Date: 2006-12-31 02:02:36
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 05:03:23PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very
> > > much.  This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various
> > > licenses.  You're welcome to your own interpretation.
> > 
> > That was my point --- that it isn't clear what "additional restrictions"
> > are, and that an advertizing clause or additional license can be
> > interpreted as the same thing.
> Somehow I don't think a statement requiring you to put some guys name
> in all your advertising material is the same as requiring you to
> preserve the copyright notice.

Agreed, but the words "additional restrictions" make no distinction on
the magnitude of additional restrictions.

  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David BorehamDate: 2006-12-31 02:54:34
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-12-31 01:16:45
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group