* Joshua D. Drake (jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com) wrote:
> > The reason I wanted to use PGP is that I already have a PGP key. X.509
> > certificates are far too complicated (a certificate authority is a
> > useless extra step in my case).
> Complete side note but one feature that I brought up to my team a
> potentially useful would be to allow the use of ssh keys for
> SSH keys are far more prevalent, and they are understood even at the
> medium corporate level.
While this may be true it's certainly also true that X.509 keys are
understood at both the medium corporate level and mid-level gov't (at
least in the US), especially inside the DOD, where they've been
mandated, as I recall.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jim C. Nasby||Date: 2006-12-30 19:35:05|
|Subject: Re: Sync Scan update|
|Previous:||From: Stephen Frost||Date: 2006-12-30 19:26:17|
|Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS|