Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Date: 2006-12-29 22:57:12
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Friday 29 December 2006 14:49, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > entirely.
> >
> > 4) GNUTLS development seems more active? OpenSSL has been in a
> > frozen/mature state for a while. I don't understand why OpenSSL is still
> > labelled as 0.9.x, which might indicate alpha quality, under heavy
> > development.
> >
> > I don't find the reasons too compelling - but they are points to
> > consider.
> 5) GNUTLS does not run well under all of our supported platforms.

given options like --enable-dtrace and --with-libedit-preferred, I don't find 
this argument compelling...

Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stefan KaltenbrunnerDate: 2006-12-29 23:08:56
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD
Previous:From: Bill MoranDate: 2006-12-29 22:53:38
Subject: Logging temp file useage ... a little advice would be appreciated

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group