Re: [PATCHES] Load distributed checkpoint patch

From: ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Takayuki Tsunakawa" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Load distributed checkpoint patch
Date: 2006-12-22 02:48:43
Message-ID: 20061222113657.6425.ITAGAKI.TAKAHIRO@oss.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches


"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:

> > I consider that smoothing the load (more meaningfully, response time)
> > has higher priority over checkpoint punctuality in a practical sense,
>
> I agree with that.

I agree with checkpoint_time is not so important, but we should
respect checkpoint_segements, or else new WAL files would be
created unboundedly, as Bruce pointed.

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2006-12-22 03:12:35 Re: Stats Collector Oddity
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-22 02:28:58 Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ITAGAKI Takahiro 2006-12-22 03:19:49 Re: Load distributed checkpoint
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-22 02:28:58 Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2