| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)it(dot)is(dot)rice(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2 |
| Date: | 2006-12-20 13:38:30 |
| Message-ID: | 20061220133830.GE12639@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 07:20:14AM -0600, Kenneth Marshall wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 01:26:59PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 20. Dezember 2006 04:44 schrieb Tom Lane:
> > > If you can show me a reasonably bulletproof or machine-checkable way to
> > > keep the two kinds of column numbers distinct, I'd be all for it.
> >
> > The only way I can see is to make the domains of the numbers distinct.
> >
> Negative vs. positive numbers?
Negative is used by system columns. Just adding some large constant
(say 10000) should be enough.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-12-20 13:48:46 | Re: Load distributed checkpoint |
| Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2006-12-20 13:20:14 | Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-12-20 13:48:46 | Re: Load distributed checkpoint |
| Previous Message | Kenneth Marshall | 2006-12-20 13:20:14 | Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2 |