| From: | Kevin Kempter <kevin(at)kevinkempterllc(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | OT - how to size/match multiple databases/apps for a single server |
| Date: | 2006-11-29 18:03:03 |
| Message-ID: | 200611291103.03410.kevin@kevinkempterllc.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi List;
I have a client looking to host/co-locate multiple PostgreSQL clusters
(inclusive of PL/pgSQL application code) per server. I did some co-location
work several years back with one of the bigger telco's and remember there
were dire consequences for not carefully evaluating the expected resource
usage of each database/app and matching apps based on some common sense (i.e.
match a memory intensive app with a CPU intensive app)
My question is:
Does anyone have any templates, guidelines, thoughts, etc with respect to how
to eval and match multiple databases for a single server. Such as a checklist
of resource items to look at and guidelines per how to line up db clusters
that should play nicely together?
Thanks in advance...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2006-11-29 18:47:00 | Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction |
| Previous Message | Brian Hurt | 2006-11-29 17:21:31 | Re: RES: Priority to a mission critical transaction |