Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: large object regression tests, take two

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Jeremy Drake <pgsql(at)jdrake(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: large object regression tests, take two
Date: 2006-11-23 05:16:14
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
This has been saved for the 8.3 release:


Jeremy Drake wrote:
> This is the latest version of the large object regression test I have been
> working on.  Note that a prerequisite for this version of the test is the
> patch I made to psql to make it not output on \lo_* commands in quiet mode
> is required (also attached, it's small).
> Sorry that it still makes use of the sed trickery like the copy test does,
> but:
> 1) I think the server side lo_(import|export) functions need to be tested
> as well as the psql variants
> 2) ISTM that making assumptions about the working directory of psql
> during
> the regression tests would open a can of worms, especially wrt VPATH
> builds where the data files could be in a completely separate tree from
> the regression tests.
> Thoughts?
> -- 
> Why did the Roman Empire collapse?
> What is the Latin for office automation?

[ Attachment, skipping... ]


[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
>        choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
>        match

  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2006-11-23 06:30:24
Subject: Direct I/O issues
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-11-23 05:09:40
Subject: Re: ISO week dates

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group