Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: "Duncan Garland" <duncan(dot)garland(at)ntlworld(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
Date: 2006-10-27 23:13:44
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Friday 27 October 2006 14:01, Josh Berkus wrote:
)> Duncan,

> > I didn't expect anybody to do a lot of work, but I did hope that
> > somebody would point me towards some authorative articles on the web.
> > They must exist.
> Hmmm ... I'm not sure how an article would be "authorative", in the absence
> of published benchmarks or evaluations by standards bodies, neither of
> which OSS DBs have yet.  Anything you got would just be someone's opinion.
> > I do appreciate your replies, they made interesting reading. You all
> > clearly believe in your product. However, it is a bit worrying that
> > nobody on the Postgres advocacy mailing list could point me towards any
> > authoratative material advocating Postgres over MySQL.
> Let me see if I can dig anything up.   Generally we try to avoid the MySQL
> comparison because it's not doing open source in general any good to
> constantly have PostgreSQL and MySQL pitted against each other.  We'd
> rather be compared with Oracle and DB2.

Generally I agree with  Josh's statements above, but I also keep a few links 
around of what other people have written for cases like this:

And of course the following is usually worth pointing people to as well.

Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Shane AmblerDate: 2006-10-28 00:04:27
Subject: Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2006-10-27 22:30:08
Subject: Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group