Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: New hardware thoughts

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)007Marketing(dot)com>
Cc: Ben Suffolk <ben(at)vanilla(dot)net>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: New hardware thoughts
Date: 2006-10-23 21:47:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 12:12:59AM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote:
> Generally more disks at slower speed - 2 10K disks in raid 0 is faster 
> than 1 15K disk. More disks also allow more options.

Not at writing they're not (unless you're using RAID0... ugh).
Jim Nasby                                            jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB      512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: SteveDate: 2006-10-23 21:51:40
Subject: Copy database performance issue
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-10-23 21:36:41
Subject: Re: Vacuum and Memory Loss

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group