Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Still need GUC update_process_title?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Still need GUC update_process_title?
Date: 2006-09-30 20:59:04
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
We added GUC update_process_title (default is 'on') in 8.2 based on
tests Tom ran showing that there was a performance impact for the
process title.  With the new use of strlcpy(), is there still an impact
from process title?  Tom, would you run your tests again?  Thanks.

  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Steve SingerDate: 2006-10-01 00:14:25
Subject: 8.2beta1 failure on IRIX
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-09-30 20:36:56
Subject: Re: libedit broke in head

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group