Still need GUC update_process_title?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Still need GUC update_process_title?
Date: 2006-09-30 20:59:04
Message-ID: 200609302059.k8UKx4Z11945@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

We added GUC update_process_title (default is 'on') in 8.2 based on
tests Tom ran showing that there was a performance impact for the
process title. With the new use of strlcpy(), is there still an impact
from process title? Tom, would you run your tests again? Thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Singer 2006-10-01 00:14:25 8.2beta1 failure on IRIX
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-30 20:36:56 Re: libedit broke in head