Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: New version of money type

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
Cc: LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: New version of money type
Date: 2006-09-28 18:37:36
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
* D'Arcy J.M. Cain (darcy(at)druid(dot)net) wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:44:24 -0400
> Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> > I'm not sure about 'money' in general but these claims of great
> > performance improvments over numeric just don't fly so easily with me.
> > numeric isn't all *that* much slower than regular old integer in the
> > tests that I've done.
> Numeric has been shown to be as good or better than money in I/O
> operations.  Where money shines is in internal calculations.

Which may be an area which could be improved on for numeric, or even a
numeric64 type added for it.  I'm not entirely sure there's a huge
amount to gain there either though...



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-09-28 18:37:57
Subject: Re: contrib uninstall scripts need some love
Previous:From: Henry B. HotzDate: 2006-09-28 18:35:45
Subject: Re: JAVA Support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group