Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: New version of money type

From: "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: LLonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: New version of money type
Date: 2006-09-28 17:12:13
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:44:24 -0400
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> I'm not sure about 'money' in general but these claims of great
> performance improvments over numeric just don't fly so easily with me.
> numeric isn't all *that* much slower than regular old integer in the
> tests that I've done.

Numeric has been shown to be as good or better than money in I/O
operations.  Where money shines is in internal calculations.

D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>         |  Democracy is three wolves                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-09-28 17:24:30
Subject: Re: Coding style for emacs
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2006-09-28 17:04:30
Subject: Re: Row IS NULL question

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group