Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Suppress some NOTICE

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Suppress some NOTICE
Date: 2006-09-02 16:07:15
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Both createuser and vacuumdb provide the same feedback as the 
> >> corresponding SQL commands.
> >> 
> >> The more I think about it, the patch that just went in is an outright 
> >> mistake.
> > Well, we had a lot of discussion when this patch was posted, and seveal
> > people liked it.  I need someone else to say they want it reverted.
> I agree with Peter: that patch is a quick hack not a considered solution.
> As for "several people said they liked it", where?  I don't see even
> one followup to

The issue is that the patch was at the end of a thread, and no one said
they didn't like it, and no one said anything when it was placed in the
patch queue.  I take that as acceptance.

But now that two people do not like it, patch reverted.

  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert TreatDate: 2006-09-02 16:07:16
Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-09-02 16:06:15
Subject: Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2006-09-02 16:30:16
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow PL/python to return
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-09-02 15:56:41
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow PL/python to return

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group