Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Suppress some NOTICE messages from REINDEX command.

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Suppress some NOTICE messages from REINDEX command.
Date: 2006-09-02 13:47:18
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
> Not sure.  I don't think the shell command and the SQL command have
> to provide the same feedback.  I don't think createuser does.  Does
> vacuumdb?

Both createuser and vacuumdb provide the same feedback as the 
corresponding SQL commands.

The more I think about it, the patch that just went in is an outright 

Peter Eisentraut

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-09-02 13:49:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-09-02 13:14:06
Subject: Re: Simplifying "standby mode"

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-09-02 14:00:40
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Suppress some NOTICE
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-09-02 13:12:50
Subject: pgsql: Add new variable "server_version_num", which is almost the same

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group