Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: logos and the BSD license

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)007marketing(dot)com>
Subject: Re: logos and the BSD license
Date: 2006-08-23 17:23:42
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Am Mittwoch, 23. August 2006 18:29 schrieb Joshua D. Drake:
> Well, in the spirit of the BSD I would say:
> Attribution (by)

Well, the main problem with that license is that it prohibits you from copying 
the works over encrypted links or storing the works on encrypted media or a 
computer protected by a password.

"You may not distribute, publicly display, publicly perform, or publicly 
digitally perform the Work with any technological measures that control 

The more general problem is that it is excessively complicated and ambiguously 
worded and doesn't achieve anything beyond what the BSD license does.

If the BSD license is too complicated still, I can offer the following 
alternative license: "You may use, modify and redistribute this software as 
you wish."

Peter Eisentraut

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: mdeanDate: 2006-08-23 17:37:54
Subject: Re: logos and the BSD license
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-08-23 17:13:02
Subject: Re: logos and the BSD license

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group