Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: DTrace enabled build fails

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Lor <Robert(dot)Lor(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DTrace enabled build fails
Date: 2006-07-31 13:08:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Lor wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >That rings a bell.  Can we get a more precise designation on what 
> >version of DTrace we support?  And where can one get that required 
> >update?
> >
> >  
> >
> Peter,
> The problem with static function was fixed recently and is now available 
> in Solaris Express (the development version of Solaris). You can get the 
> bits from I 
> forgot to mention this know issue in my previous emails!
> I was told by the DTrace engineer that this fix will be in the next 
> update of Solaris 10.

Do we need to add detection logic to catch buggy versions?

  Bruce Momjian   bruce(at)momjian(dot)us

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-07-31 13:15:03
Subject: Re: Connection limit and Superuser
Previous:From: Csaba NagyDate: 2006-07-31 13:07:45
Subject: Re: Connection limit and Superuser

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group