Re: [HACKERS] pgstattuple extension for indexes

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: satoshi nagayasu <nagayasus(at)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgstattuple extension for indexes
Date: 2006-07-28 16:22:54
Message-ID: 200607281622.k6SGMs905735@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > I thought these new functions were going to be merged into
> > /contrib/pgstattuple.
>
> Well, that's exactly what this patch seems to do ...

Well, looking at the tarball it puts everything in pgstatindex, and the
Makefile is:

#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
#
# pgstatindex Makefile
#
# $PostgreSQL$
#
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------

SRCS = pgstatindex.c

MODULE_big = pgstatindex
OBJS = $(SRCS:.c=.o)
DOCS =
DATA_built = pgstatindex.sql

ifdef USE_PGXS
PGXS := $(shell pg_config --pgxs)
include $(PGXS)
else
subdir = contrib/pgstatindex
top_builddir = /home/snaga/pgsql/sources/postgresql-8.1.3
include $(top_builddir)/src/Makefile.global
include $(top_srcdir)/contrib/contrib-global.mk
endif

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Clark C. Evans 2006-07-28 16:30:34 Re: Role incompatibilities
Previous Message Michael Glaesemann 2006-07-28 16:14:02 Re: Re: [hackers-jp: 219] Re: postgresql-8.1.4文字セットサポート

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-07-28 17:11:48 Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-28 16:03:20 Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch