Re: Time to scale up?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Pgsql-Advocacy(at)Postgresql(dot)Org" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time to scale up?
Date: 2006-07-26 14:34:25
Message-ID: 20060726143425.GC5187@surnet.cl
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> >Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >>
> >>Which version of Replication do we throw in here?
> >>
> >IMHO, the current players should be encouraged create a joint portfolio
> >that makes sense.
>
> All due respect but that is a pipe dream.

Why? The current players list reduces to

1. Slony-I

So it's not that difficult to get them to agree with themselves.

The other possible players are all excused:

- DBmirror: the author considers it obsolete
- Postgres-R: it's still under development
- erServer: obsolete, abandoned, inferior to Slony-I anyway
- Mammoth Replicator: proprietary

Am I missing anyone?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2006-07-26 14:35:57 Re: Time to scale up?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-07-26 14:05:46 Re: Time to scale up?

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2006-07-26 14:35:57 Re: Time to scale up?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-07-26 14:05:46 Re: Time to scale up?