Re: BUG #2546: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: John Weekley <weekleyj(at)foobarlabs(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: BUG #2546: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock
Date: 2006-07-25 01:43:13
Message-ID: 200607250143.k6P1hDJ29858@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom Lane wrote:
> "John Weekley" <weekleyj(at)foobarlabs(dot)net> writes:
> > Platform is 64 bit Solaris x86.
> > ...
> > "../../../../src/include/storage/s_lock.h", line 814: #error: PostgreSQL
> > does not have native spinlock support on this platform. To continue the
> > compilation, rerun configure using --disable-spinlocks. However,
> > performance will be poor. Please report this to pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org(dot)
>
> It looks like s_lock.h currently has coverage for amd64 using gcc, or
> sparc64 using either compiler, but not for amd64 using Sun's cc.
> Please feel free to send a patch, or you could pester Sun to send us
> one (Josh?)

amd64 support for Sun compilers will be in 8.2. It is already in CVS.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-07-25 01:47:36 Re: BUG #2546: PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock
Previous Message Kayteck 2006-07-25 00:58:55 BUG #2549: problem with NATURAL JOIN