Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: DocBook/XML summary

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DocBook/XML summary
Date: 2006-07-16 00:56:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > - Translation tools may work better with XML sources.  (Totally
> > unconfirmed; would need to be in actual use by someone.)
> Do you mean language translation or transformation (as in pdf?).

Language translation

> > - More typing: Things like <abc>foo</> and other abbreviations
> > won't work anymore; all attributes would need to be quoted, etc.
> That is true, but we also get better interoperability, like going
> from xml->doc

How so?

> The one thing that I am still unaware of is a good print quality
> output for Docbook XML. Now to be honest I haven't checked in some
> time but one of our primary goals *needs* to be to efficiently
> convert to PDF.

You haven't read the second paragraph of my mail.

Peter Eisentraut

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Guillaume LELARGEDate: 2006-07-16 15:58:53
Subject: Re: DocBook/XML summary
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-07-15 23:59:14
Subject: Re: DocBook/XML summary

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group