Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Fixed length datatypes. WAS [GENERAL] UUID's as

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>
Cc: mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,"A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixed length datatypes. WAS [GENERAL] UUID's as
Date: 2006-06-29 16:32:56
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 09:12:32AM +0200, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> The split make sense since clients often have powerful UUID utilities handy 
> and hence have limited or no use for such utilities in the database (true 
> for all .NET and Java clients). Some PL's will also enable such packages 
> out of the box.

I agree about splitting the utilities, except that I think the database
should be able to generate UUIDs somehow.
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software    work: 512-231-6117
vcard:       cell: 512-569-9461

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-06-29 16:35:12
Subject: Re: Single Index Tuple Chain (SITC) method
Previous:From: Marc MunroDate: 2006-06-29 16:22:35
Subject: Re: Index corruption

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2006-06-29 16:40:13
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys
Previous:From: Jasbinder BaliDate: 2006-06-29 16:29:24
Subject: Re: Database connectivity using a unix shell

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group