Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2

Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> > IIRC, newer BSDen use a kernel call for this, so you should be able to
> > measure it on your own machine. Just tweak ps_status.c to force it to
> > select PS_USE_NONE instead of PS_USE_SETPROCTITLE to generate a
> > comparison case. I'll try it on my old HPUX box too.
>
> On HPUX, I get a median time of 5.59 sec for CVS HEAD vs 5.36 sec with
> ps_status diked out, for the test case of 10000 "SELECT 1;" as separate
> transactions, assert-disabled build. So, almost 10% overhead. Given
> that the transactions can't get any more trivial than this, that's about
> a worst-case number. Not sure if it's worth worrying about or not.
> However Kris Kennaway's report a couple weeks ago suggested things might
> be worse on BSD.

Yep, I see 8% here. I will add a patch to allow the ps display to be
turned off.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce(at)momjian(dot)us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +