Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, *only because you said VERBOSE*. When we implemented the current
> elog level scheme, we designed INFO as non-suppressible so that it would
> mimic the previous behavior of VACUUM VERBOSE.
> If REINDEX had a VERBOSE option, it would make sense to put out the
> messages as INFO when VERBOSE was used. But it doesn't (and this is
> not a request to add one). Without VERBOSE, I think it's utterly
> unacceptable to force the messages out regardless of client_min_messages.
> NOTICE was a reasonable level, maybe LOG would be a better one. But
> not INFO.
LOG would be a good option, but maybe a small hack in reindexdb is
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2006-06-08 19:36:33|
|Subject: Re: Pltcl can't install on windows|
|Previous:||From: Jan Cruz||Date: 2006-06-07 23:56:22|
|Subject: length checking and encoding in postgresql 8.1.4|